Friday, April 17, 2020

Guns, Geezers, and Graves






Several weeks ago, when the Covid-19 pandemic was really just starting to get public attention, my sister-in-law in North Carolina told us that she had gone to the hardware store to get some spring plants and that the place was overrun with folks stocking up on guns and ammo. I didn’t get the connection right away; after all, viruses are too many to shoot, even with high capacity magazines, and they’re reportedly hard as hell to hit. Then I saw with my own eyes the lines at the store in the small Southern Utah town where we were staying, and I saw the reports on state and national news from around the country; this run on weaponry was a real thing. It took awhile for it to soak in that these people were getting geared up to shoot one another rather than Coronaviruses. Bizarre as hell, but I get it now. The Trumpists are coming for me, and I’m scared (and armed). 
There is a growing movement out there, led by some conservative politicians and media personalities, that is selling the notion that the governmental response to the pandemic is “draconian”, that the death numbers are inflated, and that the economic fallout is going to be worse than the disease toll. They are cooking up the standard fare of conspiracy theories, blaming all current, past, and future Democrats, and getting the Trumpist legions all atither. (Draconian: This is a word you see more of lately. I wonder how many Trumpeteers looked it up when they saw it on some right-wing Facebook post; mostly I wonder how many needed to look it up, but didn’t bother.) 
There have been protests throughout the country where both the frightened and the fear mongering are gathering to press local, state, and national authorities to drop some of the measures that have been instituted to curb the spread of disease-- to get the economy going again even at the risk of allowing the disease to get a stronger foothold. (I understand that as this pandemic continues, maybe even gets worse, declines and rebounds, whatever the scenarios are, we, as a society will have some hard choices to make. I also understand that we’re not in a position emotionally, or from a knowledge standpoint, to be able to make those choices right now. We’re too close. We’re reeling). It should be noted that after a few days of declaring himself omnipotent and getting cross threaded with a bunch of governors and senators,  Trump backed off a bit and took a tone as close to conciliatory as he's ever going to be.  He allowed he would let the governors and state legislators set their own trajectories, and some of them unveiled plans to ease into reentry mode in the next few weeks.  Maybe this will help these folks cool off a little.  I'm hopeful.
I saw some guy protesting on a YouTube telecast the other day who said, “...they have no right...!”. This in regard to government stay at home declarations and so forth. Then he went on to say that if “the old folks” needed to quarantine themselves, so be it, “...we have a right...”. I want this clown and those of his ilk to know that they actually do not “have a right” to ignore emergency measures put in place to protect the public, even if they’re too stupid to see that the measures are protecting them as well. This is a clear example of the principle exhibited in the case where Oliver Wendell Holmes drew the free speech line at falsely shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theatre: “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting FIRE in a theater and causing a panic. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature to create a clear and 
present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.” They can protest all they want, and I’m sure they will. When the protests advocate policies that make it more likely for me, and people like me, to die a horrible death of suffocation-- I draw the line. 
My story is common enough to apply here. There are thousands in similar situations: I’m 67 years old, I have asthma, I have heart disease; I’m a Covid-19 high risk individual. With the aid of decent health insurance, some great doctors, family support, and a bit of hard work, I’ve been able to manage these conditions and lead an active and productive life. I figure I have eight-to-ten years where I can continue to have a positive influence on my grand kids, do a little community service, share some valuable experience, and hopefully do something to keep future megalomaniacs out of the Oval Office. To this protester on YouTube, to the people down the street who ignore the closure on the tennis courts, and to anyone who thinks they are special-- more valuable than I, more valuable than my wife--anyone who thinks we’re expendable, I can only say one thing: Go ___k yourself! 






How the Cow Ate the Cabbage


Position Statement for a Moderate Democrat

Or

By Mike Grant



My biggest Covid-19 fear is that I’m going to get sick and die without ever having come out of my self-imposed silence in relation to political affairs.  There is a degree of hypocrisy involved in my situation that I am struggling to rationalize, but I can’t go back and say shit when I should have said it last week, last month, last decade, last century.  I can only try to set the record straight and move forward with more honesty.    Here is one example of the hypocrisy that is so disturbing;  I spent my entire working life being either directly, or indirectly, involved in extractive industry,  and in the interest of keeping my job, keeping workplace peace, or keeping happy customers, I bit my tongue and listened to the insufferable and incessant comments about tree huggers, stupid  environmentalists, greenies, and so forth.  I stashed my Sierra Club and Trout Unlimited membership cards in the back of my wallet and carried on in industries that were disgorging all manner of disgusting and destructive effluent, destroying public lands, sterilizing streams, and probably sterilizing more people than all the Planned Parenthood clinics in the country. So many of my friends and acquaintances are righties and Trumpists that the Facebook algorithm thinks I’m one too.  I get a constant barrage of unadulterated horseshit, and I just let it pass—NO MORE!  Here is how the cow ate the cabbage topic by topic.


*Trump is a narcissist.


Trump and the Covid-19 Pandemic

Let’s face it.  By this point in the Saga of Donald there is nothing he could do that his opponents would find acceptable, or that his supporters would find less than perfect, really big,  maybe the biggest thing ever, (a lot of people are saying it) , or fantastic.  After the dust settles and the investigations wind down, if we confirm that in the early days he really did downplay the seriousness of the emerging pandemic in the hopes of fending off a bad stretch for the stock market and thus protecting the wealth of his right-wing donors and billionaire buddies, then we have a crime on the order of something really big, maybe the biggest thing ever, perfectly imperfect.  Let us hope that the people in the private sector, and those remaining in the local, state, and federal governments who have professionalism and integrity can save our asses.  Then we can dig into the adjective thesaurus and go hog wild.  (Note:  April 16th Orange Man went ahead and “authorized” the governors to follow a sensible and safe approach to getting the economy started down the road to recovery.  Dr. Fauci and Mike Pence must have smacked him in the side of the head and got his attention.  I hope it holds.)


*Trump is a megalomaniac.


Reproductive Rights

I don’t kill babies.  I don’t want the government to kill babies.  Aside from the odd psycho, I don’t think anybody wants to kill babies.  A woman’s right to choose is a complex issue, and to hide behind the simplistic notion that all abortion is murder is a way to absolve oneself of having to put any real thought into it.  I find it interesting that the same people who are supposedly all about self-determination, self -reliance, and individual rights, jump on this opportunity to be all up in somebody else’s business.  There is undeniable truth in the argument that the ultimate decision is between the woman, her loving family, her conscience (possibly, but not necessarily religion based), and her trusted confidants, if she is lucky enough to have some.  I don’t have a problem with some restrictions if they are applied fairly.  A minor should be required to have the advice of parents or guardians, but with some relief in special circumstances where the guardians are demonstrably off the deep end in one way or another. A lot of people, really smart people, some of the smartest people ever, and people with compassion, really compassionate people, some of the most compassionate people in the world think that 20 weeks is a reasonable guideline for distinguishing “late term” procedures, but even then there has to be consideration for medical circumstances.  The fact is that abortion rates have been declining since 1990, and it is due to improved access to contraception rather than to increased restrictions on abortion.

How the cow ate the cabbage: 1) When abortions are illegal, people with money and connections can (and do) get discreet and safe procedures and can go back to thumping Bibles with nobody the wiser.  Disadvantaged women end up enduring much less favorable, more dangerous circumstances, and this sucks.  2)  When you get to the bottom of it, it is none of the government’s business, and none of your business either. 3)  Now the only unanswered question is whether society should subsidize the procedure through Medicaid or other programs.  If the government helps pay for any medical procedure, then it must help with this one.  If society is going to get out of the medical field all together, then there will be a whole lot more of us in trouble than the poor young lady on the tenement stoop who is struggling to find aid and hope in a terrifying circumstance, whatever that may be. 


*Trump is a demagogue.


 The Electoral College

The Electoral College is not working, and it should be eliminated or substantially modified as soon as possible.  The way it is functioning is to make the votes of some people count for more than the votes other people. Florida, with a population of about 20 million, has 29 electoral votes, or about 699,000 Floridians per electoral vote. Wyoming with a population of about 586,000 has three electoral votes, or about 195,000 Wyomingans [sic] per electoral vote. Or, to put it another way, each citizen of Wyoming has more than three-and-half times the voting power as a citizen of Florida. This violates common sense as well as the concept of "one man, one vote."



  Contrary to widely held belief, the Electoral College was not instituted to protect a courageous and self-reliant rural minority from the misguided snowflakes in the cities and on the coasts.  It was a compromise between those who wanted to select the executive by popular vote, and those who thought selection should be by Congress.  The designers of the Constitution were terrified of the exact situation we find ourselves in now.  They were paranoid about excessive executive power, and they were afraid of the power of a populist president appealing to an ill-informed and gullible public:

The president should be elected "by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation," Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 68. "A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations." 

Thirty states now require the electoral college vote to reflect the popular vote.  This is progress.  We need more.


*Trump is a douchebag.


Republicans


Back when I was a kid and we walked five miles to school through blizzards and tornados after milking the cows and feeding the chickens, Republicans  were just people who had money and who advocated policies to help make sure they could keep it.  They thought a key to keeping their money was to avoid sharing it, but you could sometimes convince them that sharing was a good idea, and they’d be okay with it.  Democrats, particularly the ones with power, (eg. Kennedys, Roosevelts, Johnson, McNamara, etc.) were people who had money and thought that there was enough money in the country that working -class people could have a share-- enough to have a decent life.  The two parties had significant differences for sure, but they generally figured a way to work things out and to get some things done.  It was give-and-take.  We built highways, dams, cars, suburbs, awesome swords and sandals movies, and had a shit-load of kids.  We made some mistakes, (Vietnam, aspects of The War on Poverty, electing Nixon), but our hearts were in the right place, and we made sincere effort to fix our screw-ups.  We could talk to one another.  It was pretty cool.


Sometime in the 1980’s, it became obvious to some Republican mucky-mucks that they weren’t likely to win many more elections unless they recruited more people.   Someone got the brilliant idea to co-opt some social issues that they really didn’t give a rat’s ass about and use them to bamboozle a whole lot of the white working-class into joining the team.  It was a miraculous turnaround for the party.  There was a kind of utilitarian mind meld between the ultra-conservative ultra-rich, and the ultra-conservative, ultra- white Christians.  Rich Republicans get enough votes from poor Republicans to keep them in power and to keep them getting richer. And we are where we are.   We don’t have civil discourse anymore and the income gap just keeps growing.







*Trump is a buffoon.

The 2nd Amendment

I don’t want your guns.  I don’t want the government to take your guns.  I don’t want the government to take my guns.  If you think you “need” a whole rack of AK 47’s to “protect my family”, I suggest you move to a different neighborhood.  If you have a gun shrine in your living room, you have problems the 2nd Amendment can’t help you with.  I don’t think it is unreasonable for state or federal laws to make guns a bit harder to get, or to limit who can own guns based on mental health, criminal record, etc.. These principles have been upheld in the courts numerous times.  I don’t think it is unreasonable for state or federal governments to limit the types of weaponry we can own.  The Constitution guarantees our right to own guns.  It does not guarantee the right to own unlimited numbers and types of guns.  I have some guns; I don’t have any fighter planes, or rocket launchers, or even any hand grenades or fully automatic assault rifles.

 Garrett Epps, in an article from 2018 in The Atlantic makes a very cogent argument in this article:  https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/03/second-amendment-text-context/555101/



Be safe, stay healthy.  Stay tuned for updates on climate change, environmentalism, and other topics.

Mike



*These comments do not have anything to with the passage they precede.  I just needed to get them in here someplace.






Friday, April 3, 2020


I started this blog in 2009 when I was off work due to a combination of factors.  Like many small businesses at the time, ours started skidding downhill so I stepped out to see if I could take some pressure off the business and get another job, and that took a while.  Shortly after that I started having some heart issues which now seem like a blip on the screen of my life, but which at the time were pretty serious.  I took the opportunity created by the downtime to write some memories and to comment on the political stuff that was happening at the time.  I really didn't have the know how or the desire to market the thing to anyone except my family, so I didn't ever accrue a following.
Now due to the Covid-19 epidemic and the social distancing edicts, etc. I’ve got downtime during the retirement that has frankly been a hoot for a couple of years.  (Hmmm?  Downtime in downtime—I’ll have to think about that a minute, could be a subject for later).  Anyway, I’ve decided to revive the thing, and I’ve decided to leave the old stuff up there for anyone who is bored as hell and doesn’t have a Kindle.  My first post is a replay of one I did earlier, and I might do some of that now and then because some of the stuff is still relevant, albeit dated. This one tells a few things about me, and might explain why I retired about as soon as I hit 65. I never did find work that didn't qualify as work.  Here goes:

Work


Disclaimer:  Work sucks!  There, I said it.  This is a cliché the use of which bothers me a great deal.  The problem is that there is no suitable substitute.  Any metaphor used to take its place is either inaccurate or ungainly.  Nothing matches “work sucks” for conciseness.  One alternative might be, “work is a prostate exam,” which is sexist, as would be, “work is like childbirth,” which is equally sexist, and woefully wrong because childbirth, although painful and difficult, is also (reportedly) satisfying.  This disqualifies it as a metaphor for work out of hand.



The June 1 issue of Newsweek has a piece that reviews two books on the subject of work.  One is The Pleasures and Sorrows of Work, by Alain de Botton in which it is proposed that the American infatuation with work is yet another dogma handed down from pre-Revolutionary times and unique to America.  The notion that work is “fun” flies in the face of a conviction held for centuries that life, including work, is essentially miserable.  This conviction, according to the author, is a defense mechanism against disappointment.  The other book is Shop Class as Soulcraft, by Matthew B. Crawford.  This book extols the virtues of “working with your hands” which has the benefits of objective results, reduced stress, etc.  (More on this later:  much of this activity is also disqualified as work.)  I must admit that at this early date, I have not read either of these books, but I certainly will.  I have the time because I am the victim of a cruel irony—work sucks worst when you don’t have any.  This is a personal tragedy that only reinforces the evidence that our relationship with work is a perversion.



Eureka!  Hallelujah!  Praise the Lord!, “ was my reaction after learning of these publications.  In reading one short essay, I was freed from self loathing as an unproductive, bitter reprobate slacker.  I was now on the forefront of contemporary thought—an avant-garde intellectual.  I can sense many of you stiffening and thinking, “What kind of communist anti-American bullshit is this?  I enjoy my work and derive great satisfaction from it, and so should you.”  Congratulations!  You don’t have a job and get paid anyway.  If you enjoy it, it ain’t work.  It’s entertainment, or sport, or mental exercise, or something—but not work.



The idea that work worship is uniquely American is verifiable by anyone who has ever tried to do business with almost any country in Christendom between mid-December, and mid-January.  The UK, South Africa, Australia, Italy, Belgium, and Brazil—all closed for the Christmas holiday.  Most companies do, however, have someone there to answer the phone and laugh at the American who thinks he actually has a need more pressing than selecting a Mediterranean beach.  We are universally regarded as a people that works too hard, too long, and at inappropriate times.  We take less vacation and work more hours when we are working than anyone I’m aware of.



Voltaire said, “Work keeps at bay three great evils:  boredom, vice, and need.”  This is an attitude born of the same Enlightenment that shaped American attitudes in the years leading up to our Revolution.  For some reason it did not stick in the minds of his French countrymen who are notoriously non-obsessed with work, perhaps because it is a load of crap.  Boredom is the very definition of work.  Work invites vice:  see white collar crime, our present financial crisis, and some of the history of organized labor.  The absurd idea that work allays need is contradicted by the fact that one of work’s primary rewards, money, drives our thirst for material gratification, and creates the “need” for more work.





An idea came up in a beer driven conversation with a former construction partner.  I don’t know whether it was an original thought that Josh had, or if he got it from someone else.  It seems a little deep for Josh, but beer does that.  Josh’s idea was that society ought to be set up so that we all just party and have a good time until we’re, say 55, and then work our asses off until we drop dead.  This idea warrants some consideration.  George Bernard Shaw said, “Youth is wasted on the young.”  I would agree, and add that work is imposed on the young.  Think of all the youthful creativity and energy wasted on the drudgery of “making a living”, when what we are really doing is making a slow death.  Think of the money that would be saved on health care for the aged.  If an old fart gets senile, he just stumbles in front of a bulldozer, and that’s it.   There would be no drawn-out humiliating existence in a care facility that takes up valuable resources and wastes the talent of nurses and doctors—no more images of emaciated, bed-ridden grandpas with sunken eyes and tubes going in and coming out.  The possibilities for societal improvement seem endless.  The economic stimulant implications are immense.  The young do not take the senior discount, and are less likely to skimp on tips.  Like most utopian solutions, this one has some flaws, but it should be in the conversation.



Another possible solution to the problem of work would be to increase pay based on the degree to which the work is disliked.  The obvious problem with this idea is that it probably wouldn’t change things for most people.  The office administrator who spends the day licking the shoes of some self-important personification of the Peter Principle would still make more than the house painter who will walk off the job and straight to the bar at the merest hint of bullshit from the boss, reeking of satisfaction all the way.  An even greater problem would be the need for some device for measuring discontent.  We certainly couldn’t just hand out money to the biggest whiners and starve the stoics.  There would have to be a brain implant, or a periodic test similar to the personality profile questionnaire you answer when you apply at Home Depot.



“No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem.”—Booker T. Washington:

This is, among other things, a paen to those who toil.  Toil is strenuous labor, but not necessarily work.  Work contains no dignity.  Some examples differentiating work from toil are in order.

·       Building fence is great sport:  outside, physical, yet requires some craft—straight, square, etcetera—immediately tangible results, and can be done while having a few beers.  There are many “puttering around the house” activities that are good rewarding fun. Some are not.

·       Plumbing under the sink sucks, and qualifies easily as work.

·       Fixing cars made before about 1980 can be fun.  Working on any car that has the engine in there sideways sucks.  If you look through the engine compartment and see the ground, there is potential for some entertainment.  If the compartment is so packed with shit that not even light can escape, you have a black hole, which sucks in the literal and figurative sense.

·       Sales, which I have done most of my life now, sucks—rejection, disappointment, catering to assholes, motels, fast food, or no food, and windshield time.

·       Mining was a kick and didn’t become work until it made me sick.  It was a little kid’s dream—playing with giant Tonka Toys, blowing stuff up, unrestrained cussing, and a great espirit de corps.

·       Writing a poem does not suck.



One of the triumphs in my life of toil came during a summer stint at the lumber mill in Walden, Colorado.  The mill superintendant was the father of a classmate.  Kent was one of the class athletes-- good at football and wrestling.  Let's just say I wasn't.  I suspect he and his dad thought it would be entertaining to watch me perform in exceptionally difficult circumstances.  Dad put me to work sorting slabs and flitches on the head rig.



When a log went through the initial process after debarking, it was ripped lengthwise into flat segments (flitches) that would eventually become boards.  Making a round log square necessarily leaves four “slabs”, which are the ugly outside segments that have jagged limb stubs sticking out, and are often warped, hard to manage, and always pointed on the lead end.  When the ripped log shot onto a chain conveyor, my job was to, by any means necessary, get the slabs the hell off the conveyor and let the future lumber go by.  I stood facing the onslaught and dodged lumber while grabbing slabs and flinging them onto a conveyor going another direction.  I was aided in this by a high speed roller called “the pineapple” because it had beads welded around for traction on the slabs.  The pineapple would grab anything that touched it and shoot it about 20 feet.  My position was on a little platform right in front of the pineapple, and I became a virtual ballerina on that deck, dodging and slinging in a rhythm matching the output of the saw, and all the time avoiding getting grabbed by that spinning pineapple.



Kent was doing a much more dignified job in the same area of the mill, and was in position to watch me all day.  After about a week and a half, Kent said, “You know Grant; I’ve got to tell you I didn’t think you’d make it this long.  We usually give that job to winos and bums because we know they won’t be here long.  They almost always take a ride on that pineapple and don’t show up the next day.”  I think I gained some respect after that—from Kent, and certainly from myself.  I quit two days later and went to the mine for an extra 25 or 30 cents an hour.



Now that was good, wholesome, make me dog-assed tired, toil.  And I’d go back to it in a heartbeat if I still had any ballerina in me.  I know some women who get turned on by the smell of pine pitch and diesel fuel.

Featured Post

Absolutely Everything You Need to Know about Healthcare

Healthcare 2020 2009 was an eventful year in developments leading up to our current state of political and economic division and inequali...